Engineering
expertise.
Verified
impact.

A structured engagement and verification framework converting expert engineering guidance into audit-ready impact records — mapped to the reporting frameworks the engineering sector already uses.

Standards aligned to
GRI 404 GRI 413 ESRS S1 ESRS S3 ISSB S1 SASB PS TCFD SDG 6 SDG 9 SDG 17 ISO 26000 WDI UN GC
What FieldBridge is

The verification layer that field engineering guidance has always needed

Who benefits

Every participant has a genuine reason to be here

FieldBridge is designed so that the value is real for every party. Each stakeholder gains something meaningful — and that mutual stake is what makes the model work.

"Not just reportable — verifiable. There is a meaningful difference between recording that something happened and being able to demonstrate what it produced."

FIELDBRIDGE
NG
NGO partners

A new evidence layer for corporate partnerships

  • Move from narrative reporting to structured outcome data
  • Give partners evidence that maps into their ESG disclosures
  • Strengthen the case for sustained and growing corporate engagement
  • Re-engage alumni through a structured, meaningful contribution pathway
FE
Engineers in the field

Real expertise at the moment it matters most

  • Structured access to relevant specialist knowledge when it is needed
  • Decision support, risk reduction and technical confidence in a single session
  • Human resilience and wellbeing support built into the same framework
  • Connection to a broader engineering community during demanding deployments
EC
Expert contributors

Meaningful contribution — structured, verified, recognised

  • A time-bound, low-burden way to apply expertise where it matters most
  • A named, verified contribution record — CPD-adjacent and professionally meaningful
  • Real decisions influenced in real contexts — not performative volunteering
  • Connection to field professionals and a growing expert network
CO
Corporate partners

Audit-ready data that replaces self-reported hours

  • Dual-confirmed records structured for GRI 404 and 413 disclosure
  • Move from activity counts to verified outcomes with named field metrics
  • Employee development through genuine cross-context field challenges
  • Defensible contribution evidence across ESRS, ISSB, SASB and TCFD frameworks
The VGE process

From session to verified record

A guided engagement — called a Verified Guidance Event — is a structured, time-defined session between an engineer in the field and an experienced specialist. It follows a four-step flow and is only counted when both parties confirm independently. That confirmation is what makes the data audit-defensible rather than self-reported.

EACH VGE CAPTURES
Session metadata
Field context
Guidance provided
Outcome data
Dual confirmation — both parties independently
01
Request
Session created. Problem, context and urgency defined. Matched to a relevant specialist.
02
Session
30-minute minimum structured engagement. Technical, Resilience or Integrated. Outside the platform — we timestamp it.
03
Outcomes
Decision clarity, risk reduction, confidence change, knowledge transfer — both parties capture independently.
04
Confirmation
Both parties confirm independently. Until both confirm, no record is created.
VGE
Verified record
A timestamped, outcome-structured record. Exportable. Mapped to reporting standards. Audit-ready.
IN
FIELD
EX
PERT

Dual confirmation — what makes it different

The engineer in the field and the specialist contributor confirm independently. Until both confirm, no record is created. This is what separates a verified outcome record from a self-reported volunteer hour — and what makes FieldBridge data defensible under GRI, ESRS and ISSB scrutiny.

Reporting standards

Mapped to the frameworks the engineering sector already reports against

FieldBridge data is structured from the ground up to map into the disclosure frameworks that engineering firms and their international counterparts currently report against — filling the gap between what they report and what they can verify.

Australian and Asia-Pacific firms

Report GRI 404 and 413. Skills-based volunteering hours currently self-reported with no outcome evidence. FieldBridge makes them dual-confirmed and audit-defensible.

UK and European firms

Subject to CSRD and ESRS S1/S3 requirements on workforce and affected communities. FieldBridge data maps directly into these mandatory disclosures.

Global engineering consultancies

Reporting SASB, TCFD and SDGs alongside GRI. VGE records map across all frameworks simultaneously from a single structured dataset.

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
GRI 404-1
Average hours of training per employee
GRI 404-2
Programs for upgrading employee skills
GRI 413-1
Operations with local community engagement
EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD / ESRS)
ESRS S1
Own workforce — skills, training and development
ESRS S3
Affected communities — engagement and impact
ISSB · SASB · TCFD
ISSB S1
General sustainability-related disclosures
SASB PS
Professional services — human capital
TCFD
Social risk management disclosures
UN Sustainable Development Goals · ISO 26000 · WDI · UN Global Compact
SDG 6
Clean water and sanitation
SDG 9
Infrastructure and innovation
SDG 17
Partnerships for the goals
ISO 26000
Community involvement and development
WDI
Workforce Disclosure Initiative
UN GC 1–6
Human rights and labour principles
Get in touch

We are forming our founding pilot cohort

FieldBridge is in pilot stage with a small number of NGO and engineering firm partners. If you would like to explore whether FieldBridge is a fit for your organisation, we would welcome the conversation.