A structured engagement and verification framework converting expert engineering guidance into audit-ready impact records — mapped to the reporting frameworks the engineering sector already uses.
FieldBridge is designed so that the value is real for every party. Each stakeholder gains something meaningful — and that mutual stake is what makes the model work.
"Not just reportable — verifiable. There is a meaningful difference between recording that something happened and being able to demonstrate what it produced."
A guided engagement — called a Verified Guidance Event — is a structured, time-defined session between an engineer in the field and an experienced specialist. It follows a four-step flow and is only counted when both parties confirm independently. That confirmation is what makes the data audit-defensible rather than self-reported.
The engineer in the field and the specialist contributor confirm independently. Until both confirm, no record is created. This is what separates a verified outcome record from a self-reported volunteer hour — and what makes FieldBridge data defensible under GRI, ESRS and ISSB scrutiny.
FieldBridge data is structured from the ground up to map into the disclosure frameworks that engineering firms and their international counterparts currently report against — filling the gap between what they report and what they can verify.
Report GRI 404 and 413. Skills-based volunteering hours currently self-reported with no outcome evidence. FieldBridge makes them dual-confirmed and audit-defensible.
Subject to CSRD and ESRS S1/S3 requirements on workforce and affected communities. FieldBridge data maps directly into these mandatory disclosures.
Reporting SASB, TCFD and SDGs alongside GRI. VGE records map across all frameworks simultaneously from a single structured dataset.
FieldBridge is in pilot stage with a small number of NGO and engineering firm partners. If you would like to explore whether FieldBridge is a fit for your organisation, we would welcome the conversation.